Armstrong, T. (1994). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Bellon, J., Bellon, E., & Blank, M. (1992). Teaching from a research knowledge base: A development and renewal process. New York; Macmillan.
Bolman, L., & Deal, T. (1994). Becoming a teacher leader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Bransford, J. D., A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking (Eds.) (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Bridges, L. (1995). Assessment: Continuous Learning. York, ME: Stonehouse.
Campbell, L., & Campbell, B. (1999). Multiple Intelligences and Student Achievement: Success Stories from Schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Carr. J. C., & Harris, D. E. (2001). Succeeding with Standards: Linking Curriculum, Assessment, and Action Planning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Doran, R., Chan, F., & Tamir, P. (1998). Science Educator’s Guide to Assessment. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
Doyle, W. (1992). Curriculum and pedagogy. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research in curriculum (pp. 486-516). New York: Macmillan.
Farenga, S. J., and B. A. Joyce (2002). Teaching youngsters science in a culturally diverse urban classroom. In Commitment to excellence: Transforming teaching and teacher education in inner-city and urban settings, eds. A. C. Diver-Stammers and L. A. Catelli, 149-170. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Farenga, S. J., B. A. Joyce, and D. Ness (2002). Reaching the zone of optimal learning: Aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment. In Learning science and the science of learning, ed. R. Bybee, 51-64. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Fullan, M. G. (February, 1996). Turning Systemic Thinking on its Head. Phi Delta Kappam, 420-423.
Gardner, H. (November, 1995). Reflections on multiple intelligences: Myths and messages. Phi Delta Kappa. 200-209.
Glatthorn, A. (1994). Developing a quality curriculum. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Glatthorn, A. (1995). Content of the curriculum (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Glatthorn, A. A., (1998). Performance Assessment and Standards-Based Curricula: The Achievement Cycle. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.
Glasser, W., M.D. (April, 1997). A new look at school failure and school success. Phi Delta Kappan, 597-602.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.
Harmin, M. (1994). Inspiring Active Learning: A Handbook for Teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Harris, D. & Carr, J. (1996). How to use standards in the classroom. Alexander, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Hug, B. and the Center for Highly Interactive Computing in Education. (2002). How can my good friends make me sick? Curriculum materials. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Jacobs, H. (1997). Mapping the big picture: Integrating curriculum and assessment K-12. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Jensen, E. (1998). Teaching with the Brain in Mind. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lewis, Catherine C. (2002). Lesson Study: A handbook of Teacher-led Instructional Change. Philadelphia, PA: research for Better Schools, Inc.
Lezotte, L. (1997). Learning for all. Okemos, MI: Effective School Products.
Lieberman, A. (1995). The work of restructuring schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
Marzano, R. (2000). Transforming Classroom Grading. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D., & McTighe, J. (1993). Assessing Student Outcomes. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
McClay, J. L. (1996). The multi-age classroom. Westminster, CA: Teacher Created Materials.
Mintzes, J. J., J. Wandersee, and J. Novak. (2000). Assessing science understanding. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Howe, H. (1993). Thinking About Our Kids. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Hyerle, D. (1996). Visual Tools for Constructing Knowledge. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Payne, R. P. (1998). A Framework for Understanding Poverty. Highlands, TX: RFT Publishing Co.
Martin, D. J. (1997). Elementary Science Methods: A Constructivist Approach. New York, NY: Delmar.
Mestre, J. P., & R. R. Cocking. (2000). The Science of Learning. Special Issue of Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21: 1 - 135.
Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. Mawah, N. J: Lawrence Erbaum Associates
Palmer, P. (1998). The Courage To Teach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Pate, P. E., McGinnis, K., & Homestead, E. (1995). Creating coherence through curriculum integration. In Beane, J. A. (Ed.), 1995 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp. 62-70). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Pogrow, S. (June, 1996). Reforming the wannabe reformers: Why education reform always end up making things worse. Phi Delta Kappa. 77(10), 653.
Popham, W. J. (1995). Classroom Assessment: What Teachers Need to Know. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Popham, W. J. (2001). The Truth About Testing: An Educator’s Call to Action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Post, T. R., Ellis, A. K., Humphreys, A. H., & Buggey, L. J. (1997). Interdisciplinary approaches to curriculum: Themes for teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Reinhartz, J., & Beach, D, (1997). Teaching and Learning in the Elementary School: Focus on Curriculum. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Sanders, W. L. & J. C. Rivers. (1996). Cumulative and Residual Effects of Teachers on Future Student Academic Achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center
Schlechty, P. (1997). Inventing better schools: An action plan for education reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schmoker, M. (1996). Results: The Key to Continuous School Improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Sergiovanni, T. (1994). Building community in schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Serim, F., & Koch, M. (1996). Netlearning: Why Teachers Use the Internet. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.
Schmoker, M. (2001). The Results Fieldbook: Practical Strategies from Dramatically Improved Schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Sornson, R., & Scott, J. (1997). Teaching & Joy. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Sprenger, M. (1999). Learning and Memory: the Brain in Action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Stearns, C. (1999). An Assessment Sample: A Resource for Elementary School Teachers, Administrators, and Staff Developers. Rahway, NJ: Merck Institute for Science education.
Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Summit Books. (Ch. 7. Provides an introduction to lesson study and makes a “something like lesson study” needs to be developed in the U.S.)
Stunard, E. A. (June, 1997). The Chicago Forum. Phi Delta Kappa, 774-776.
Tishman, S., Perkins, D. N., & Jay, E. (1995). The Thinking Classroom: Learning and Teaching in a Culture of Thinking. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Tomlinson, C. A. (1995). How To Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of all Learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Wiggins, G. (1995). Curricular coherence and assessment: Making sure that the effect matches the intent. J. A. Beane (Ed.), 1995 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp. 101-119). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding By Design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Williams, R. B. (1997). Twelve Roles of Facilitators for School Change. Arlington Heights, IL: IRI/Skylight Training and Publishing, Inc.
Zorfas, J. M. (1998). Teaching Middle School Students to be Active Researchers. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Barth, R. (1990). Improving Schools from Within. San Fransico: Jossey-Bass
Brooks, J. G. & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In Search for Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (1991). Making Connections: Teaching and the Human Brain. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (1990). Understanding a Brain-Based Approach to Learning and Teaching. Education Leadership, 48 (2), 66-70.
Fogarty, R. (1991). The Mindful School: How to Integrate the Curricula. Palatine, IL: IRI/Skylight.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. NY: Basic Books.
Resnick, L. B., & Klopfer, L. E. (1989). Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research. In 1989 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp.1-18), Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Schlechty, P. C. (1990). Schools for the Twenty-first Century: leadership Imperatives for Educational Reform. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
Strong, M. (May 1985). The seven kinds of smart. Readers Digest, 193-202.
Abdi, S. W. (1997). Motivating students to enjoy questioning. The Science Teacher, 64(6), 10.
Aldridge, B. G. (1994). Anticipating future things: Some thoughts on science education in 2044, Science and Children, 31(7), 20-21.
Alley, L., & Jansak, K. (2001). The ten keys to quality and assessment in online learning. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, 13(3), 3-18.
Anderson, O. R. (1997). A neurocognitive perspective on current learning theory and science instructional strategies. Science Education, 81(1), 67-89.
Andrew, M. (1990). The differences between graduates of four-year and five-year teacher preparation programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 45-51.
Avery, P. (1999). Authentic assessment and instruction. Social Education, 65, 368-373.
Barman, C. (1992). An evaluation of the use of a technique designed to assist prospective elementary teachers in using the learning cycle with science textbooks. School Science and Mathematics, 92(2), 59-63.
Barman, C. N., Cox, M. L., Newhouse, K., & Goldston, M. (2000). Assessing students’ ideas about animals. Science and Children, 37(1), 44-49.
Barth, R. (1991). Restructuring schools: Some questions for teachers and principals. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(2), 123-128.
Barton, A. C. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38 (8); 899-917.
Becker, H. L. (1994). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), 291-321.
Berkey, T. & DuFour, R. (1995). The principal as staff developer. Journal of Staff Development, 16(4), 2-6.
Berlin, D., & White, A. (1994). The Berlin-White Integrated Science and Mathematics Model. School Science and Mathematics, 94(1), 2-4.
Berry, B. (2001). No shortcuts to preparing good teachers. Educational Leadership, 58(8), 32-36.
Black, P., and D. Wiliam. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education 5 (1): 7-74.
Brent, R., Wheatley, E., & Thomson, S. (1996). Videotaped microteaching: Bridging the gap from the university to the classroom. The Teacher Educator, 31, 238-247.
Bradford, D. J. (1999). Exemplary urban middle school teachers’ use of five standards of effective teaching. Teaching and Change, 7 53-78.
Bruner, J. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21.
Cabello, B., & Terelle, R. (1994). Making students feel like family: How teachers create warm and caring classroom climates. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 29, 17-23.
Carlson, L. E. and J. F. Sullivan (2004). Exploiting design to inspire interest in engineering across the K-16 curriculum. International Journal of Engineering Education 20: 372-378.
Carter, K. (1999). Stretching your technology resources. Technology and Learning,19(7), 22-30.
Chiappetta, E. (1997). Inquiry-based science: Strategies and techniques for encouraging inquiry in the classroom. Science Teacher, 64(7), 22-26.
Chinn, C., and B. Malhotra. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry for schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education 86(2), 175-218.
Christenson, D. D. (2001, December). Building state assessment from the classroom up: Why Nebraska has forsworn high-stakes testing in favor of district-tailored measures. The School Administrator, 58(11), 27-31.
Clark, F. T. (1998). Integrating technology into the classroom: A teacher’s perspective. TechTrends for Leaders in Education and Training, 43(20), 45-46.
Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students’ preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1241-1257.
Clough, M. P. (2000). The nature of science: Understanding how the “game” of science is played. The Clearing House, 74,13-17.
Cochran-Smith, M., (1991). Learning to teach against the grain. Harvard Educational Review, 61, 279-310.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1992). Integrating cultural diversity: Inquiry and action. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(2), 104-115.
Cohen, E. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for constructive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
Conyers, J. G., Kappel, T., & Rooney, J. (1999). How technology can transform a school. Educational Leadership, 56(5), 82-85.
Corno, L. (2000). Looking at homework differently. Elementary School Journal, 100, 529-548.
Mertler, Craig A. (2001). Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 7 (25). Available on-line: http://ericae.net/pare/getvn.asp?v=7&n=25
Crawley, F. E., Barufaldi, J. P. & Salyer, B. A. (1994). Coordinated thematic science in the classroom: A view from pilot teachers. School Science and Mathematics., 94(5), 240-247.
Dagler, Z. A. (1994). Does the use of analogies contribute to conceptual change? Science Education, 78(6), 601-604.
Daisey, P., & Shroyer, M. G. (1995). Parents speak up: Examining parent and teacher roles in elementary science instruction. Science and Children, 33(3), 24-29.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1992). Teaching and knowledge: Policy issues posed by alternate certification for teachers. Peabody Journal of Education, 67(3), 123-154.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Who will speak for the children? How teachers for America hurts urban schools and students. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(1), 21-34.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). What matters most: A competent teacher for every child. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(3), 193-200.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000c). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1
Darling-Hammond, L. (2003). Keeping good teachers: Why it matters, what leaders can do. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 8-13.
Darling-Hammond, L., Chung, R., & Frelow, F. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach? Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 286-302.
DeFour, R. (1998). Why look elsewhere: Improving schools from within. The School Administrator, 2 (55), 24-28. DeFour, R. (2001). In the right context. Journal of Staff Development, Winter, 14-17.
deGarcia, J. L. J. F. Sullinam, L. E. Carlson, and D. W. Carlson (2001). A K-12/university partnership: Creating tomorrow’s engineers. Journal of Engineering Education 90: 557-563.
Delgado-Gaitan, C. (1991). Involving parents in the schools: a process of empowerment. American Journal of Education, 100: 20-46.
Dexter, S. L., Anderson, R. E., & Becker, H. J. (1999). Teachers’ view of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Teacher Education, 31(3), 221-239.
Donahoe, T. (1993). Finding the way: Structure, time, and culture in school improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(4), 298-305.
Dorsey-Davis, J. D., Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (1991). The role of rewording and context personalization in the solving of mathematical word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 61-68.
Dryfus, A., & Jungwirth, E. & Eliovitch, R. (1990). Applying the cognitive conflict strategy for conceptual change-some implications, difficulties, and problems. Science Education, 74(5), 555-569.
DuFour, R. (1995). Restructuring is not enough. Educational Leadership, 52(7), 33-36. DuFour, R. (1997a). Make the words of mission statements come to life. Journal of Staff Development, 18(3), 54-55.
DuFour, R. (1997b). Moving toward the school as a learning community. Journal of Staff Development, 18(1), 52-53.
DuFour, R. (1997c). Seeing with new eyes. Journal of Staff Development, 18(4), 38-39.
Dukewits, P., & Gowin, L. (1996). Creating successful collaborative teams. Journal of Staff Development, 17(4), 12-16.
Dyrli, O., & Kinnaman, D. (1995). Teaching effectively with technology. Technology and Learning, 15(6), 52-57.
Eastwood, K. & Louis, K. (1992). Restructuring that lasts: Managing the performance dip. Journal of School Leadership, 2(2), 213-224.
Edwards, C. (1997). Promoting student inquiry. The Science Teacher, 64(5), 18-22.
Edwards, C. H. (2001). Student violence and the moral dimensions of education. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 249-257.
English, R. E., & Reigelruth, C. M. (1996). Formative evaluation research on sequencing instruction with elaboration theory.
Educational Technology and Research Journal, 44, 23-41.
Enochs, L. G., Scharmann, L.C., & Riggs, I. M. (1995). The relationship of pupil control to preservice elementary science teacher self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. Science Education, 70(1), 63- 75.
Essex, N. L. (2000). Zero tolerance approach to school violence: Is it going to far? American Secondary Education, 29(2), 37-40.
Fieman-Nemser, S. (2001). Helping novices learn to teach: lessons from an exemplary support teacher, Journal of Teacher Education, 52(1), 17-30.
Fetterman, D. (2002). Web surveys to digital movies: Technology tools of trade. Educational Researcher, 31(6), 29-37.
Ferguson, R. F., & Womack, S. T. (1993). The impact of subject matter and educational coursework on teaching performance. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 55-63.
Forester, K. (2000). Homework: A bridge too far? Issues in Educational Research, 10, 21-37.
Flick, L., and M. Tomlinson. (2001). The role of reading in teaching science inquiry. The Oregon Science Teacher 42: 9-12.
Flowers, N., Mertens, S. B., & Mulhall, P. F. (1999). The impact of teaming: Five research-based outcomes of teaming. Middle School Journal, 31(2), 57-60.
Flowers, N., Mertens, S. B., & Mulhall, P. F. (2000a). How teaming influences classroom practices. Middle School Journal, 32(2), 52-59.
Flowers, N., Mertens, S. B., & Mulhall, P. F. (2000b). What makes interdisciplinary teams effective? Middle School Journal, 31(4), 53-56.
Foster, G. W., & Heiting, F. (1994). Embedded assessment. Science and Children, 32(2), 30-33.
Foster, G. W., & Penick, J. E. (1985). Creativity in a cooperating group setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(1), 89-98.
Frank, C., Uy, F. L., & Adenika-Morrow, J. (2000). Observing science and mathematics instruction with “insider eyes.” National Forum of Teacher Education Journal, 11(1), 31-42.
Fuchs, L. D., K. karns, C. hanlett, and M. Katzaroff (1999). Mathematics performance assessment in the classroom: Effects on teacher planning and student problem solving. American Educational Research Journal 36: 609-646.
Futrell, M., Gomez, J., & Bedden, D. (2003). Teaching the children of a new America. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(5), 381-385.
Gardner, D. H. (1996). Bringing families and science together. Science and Children, 34(2), 14-16.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B., & Yoon, K. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-954.
Garthwait, A. & Verrill, J. (2003). E-Portfolios: documenting student progress (Digitally capturing students’ growth throughout the year provides opportunities to assess learning and a whole lot more.) Science and Children, 40(8), 22-27.
Gaskill, P. E. (2002). Progress in the certification of middle-level personnel. Middle School Journal, 35(5), 33-40.
Geringer, J. (2003). Reflections on professional development: Toward high-quality teaching and learning, Phi Delta Kappan, January, 373
Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (2000, summer). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 129-145.
Gopalakrishnan Jayasinghe, M., Morrison, G. R., & Ross, S. M. (1997). The effect of distance learning classroom design on student perceptions. Educational Technology, research, and Development, 45, 5-19.
Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V. & Laine, R. D. (1996). The effects of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 57, 415-435.
Grolnick, W., Benjet, C.,Kurowski, C., & Apostoleris, N. (1997). Predicators of parent involvement in children’s schooling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 538-540.
Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, June, 748
Guskey, T. R. (2003). Scooping up meaningful evidence. Journal of Staff Development, 24(4), 27-30.
Haladyna, T. M., Nolan, S. B., & Haas, N. S. (1991). Raising standardized test scores and the analysis of test score pollution. Educational Researcher, 20, 2-7.
Hamman, D., Berthelot, J., Saia, J., & Crowley, E. (2000). Teachers’ coaching of learning and its relation to students’ strategic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 342-348.
Havens, J. (2003).Student web pages-a performance assessment they’ll love. Phi Delta Kappan, May, 710
Hawkey, K. (1998). Mentor pedagogy and student teacher professional development: A study of two mentoring relationships. Teacher and Teacher Education, 14(4). 657-670.
Haycock, K. (1998, Summer). Good teaching matters…a lot. Thinking K-16, 3-14.
Hazler, R. J., & Carney, J. V. (2000). When victims turn aggressors: Factors in the development of deadly school violence. Professional School Counseling, 4, 105-112.
Herman, J. L., & Winters, L. (1994). Portfolio research: A slim collection. Educational Leadership, 52, 91-98.
Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., et al. (1996). Problem-solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 23, 12-21.
Hills, J. R. (1991). Apathy concerning grading and testing. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 2: 540-545.
Hodson, D. (1994). In search of a rationale for multicultural science education. Science Education, 77(6), 685-711.
Hogan, M. P. (2000). Chickscope realized: A situated evaluation of a sixth-grade classroom. International Journal of Educational Technology, 2(1). Available at http://www.outreach.uiuc.edu/ijet/v2n1/hogan/index.html
Horton, P. B., A. A. Conney, M. Gallo, A. L. Woods, G. J. Senn, and D. Hamelin. (1993). An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Science Education 77(1): 95-111.
Howe, A. C., & Bell, J. (1998). Factors associated with successful implementation of interdisciplinary curriculum units. Research in Middle Level Education Quarterly, 21 (2), 39-52.
Hunter, L., Elias, M. J., & Norris, J. (2001). School-based violence prevention: Challenges and lessons learned from action research project. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 161-175.
Huntley, M. A. (1999). Theoretical and empirical investigations of integrated mathematics and science education in the middle grades with implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 50(1), 57-67.
Ingersoll, R. M. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 26-37.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2003, January 7). To close the gap, quality counts. Education Week, 7-18.
Ingersoll, R. M., & Smith, T. M. (2003, May). The wrong solution to the teacher shortage. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 30-33.
Iwasyk, M. (1997). Kids questioning kids: “Experts” sharing. Science and Children, 35(1), 42-46.
Jacobs, D. & Reyhner, J. (2002, January). Preparing teachers to support American Indian and Alaska Native student success and cultural heritage. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service N. ED 459 990)
James, R., Lamb. C., Householder, D., & Bailey, M. (2000). Integrating science, mathematics and technology in middle school technology rich environments: A study of implementation and change. School Science and Mathematics, 100(1), 27-35.
Jegede, O. J. (1995). An investigation of student’s disposition to the use of objectives in distance learning materials. Educational Research, 37, 293-304.
Jelmberg, J. R. (1996). College based teacher education versus state sponsored alternative programs. Journal of Teacher education, 47, 60-66.
Jonassen, D. (1995). Supporting communities of learners with technologies: A vision for integrating technology with learning in schools. Educational Technology, 35(4), 60-63.
Johnson, S. M., & Kardos, S. M. (2002, March). Keep new teachers in mind. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 12-16.
Jones, M. G. (1994). Assessment potpourri. Science and Children, 32(2), 14-17.
Jones, R. (2000). Textbook troubles. American School Board Journal, 187 (12), 18-21.
Kain, J. F., & Singleton, K. (1996, May/June). Equality of educational opportunity revisited. New England Economic Review, 87-111.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2000). Incorporating learner experience into design of multimedia experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 126-136.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2001). Learner experience and efficiency of instructional guidance. Educational Psychology, 21, 5-23.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Tuovinen, J., & Sweller, J. (2001). When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 579-588.
Kame, M. (1996). A teacher’s implementation of authentic assessment in an elementary science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33: 859-877.
Kaplan, L. S., & Owings, W. A. (2003). No child left behind: The politics of teacher quality. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(9), 687-692.
Kelleher, J. (2003). A model for assessment-driven professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, June, 751.
Kelly, K. (2001, May/June). Teachers helping teachers. Harvard Educational Letter, 17,5
King, M. B. & Newmana, F. M. (2000, April). Will teacher learning advance school goals? Phi Delta Kappan, 81(8), 32.
Klahr, D., and M. Nigam. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science 15(10): 661-667.
Ku, H.-Y., & Sullivan, H. (2000). Learner control over full and lean computer-based instruction under personalization of mathematical word problems in Taiwan. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48 (3), 49-60.
Laczko-Kerr, I., & Berliner, D.C. (2003). In harm’s way: How undercertified teachers hurt their students. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 34-39.
Lane-Garon, P. (2001). Classroom and conflict management. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Denver, CO, February 2-6, 2002. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 465 716).
Lamb, A., Smith, N., & Johnson, L. (1997). Wondering, wiggling, & weaving: A model for project and community-based learning on the Web. Learning & Leading with Technology, 24(7),6-13.
Lantieri, L., & Patti, J. (1998). Waging peace in our schools. Journal of Negro Education, 65, 356-368.
Lee, O., Eichinger, C., Anderson, C., Berkheimer, G., & Blakeslee, T. (1993). Changing middle school students’ conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 249-270.
Lee, V., & Smith, J. (1993). Effects of school restructuring on the achievement and engagement of middle-grades students. Sociology of Education, 66(3), 164-187.
Levin, H. (1994). Improving educational productivity: Putting kids at the center. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(10), 758-760.
Levin, M. (2002, March). Why invest in professional development schools? Educational Leadership, 59(6), 65-67.
Lewis, C. & Tsuchida, I. (1997). Planned educational change in Japan: The shift to student-centered elementary science. Journal of Educational Policy, 12:5, 313-331.
Lewis, C. & Tsuchida, I. (1998, Winter). A lesson is like a swiftly flowing river: Research lessons and the improvement of Japanese education. American Educator, 14-17 & 50 –52. Available at: www.lessonresearch.net
Linn, M., Lewis, C., Tsuchida, I., & Songer, N. (2000). Science lessons and beyond: Why do U.S. and Japanese students diverge in science achievement? Educational Researcher, 29, 4-14.
Louks-Horsley, S. (1999). Try on strategies to get a good fit. Journal of Staff Development, 20(3), 56-60.
Louis, K. S., Kruse, S., & Raywid, M. A. (1996). Putting teachers at the center of reform. NASSP Bulletin, 80(580), 9-21. Margerum-
Leys, J., B. Fisman, and D. Peek-Brown. (2204). Lab partners: research university and urban district join forces to promote standards-based student learning in science. Journal of Staff Development 25 (4): 38-42.
Margerum-Leys, J. and R. W. Marx. (2002). Teacher knowledge of educational technology: A case study of student/mentor teacher pairs. Journal of Educational Computing Research 26 (4): 427-462.
Mathis, W. J. (2003). No child left behind: costs and benefits. Phi Delta Kappan, May, 679.
Matkins, J. J. & Sterling, D. R. (2003). Designing assessments: science test questions from National Assessment of Educational Progress tests can be helpful model when creating assessments for your lessons. Science and Children, 40(8), 34-37.
Martens, M. (1990). Getting a grip on groups. Science and Children, 27(5), 18-19.
Martens, M. L. (1992). Inhibitors to implementing a problem solving approach to teaching elementary science: A case study of a teacher in charge. School Science and Mathematics, 92(3), 153.
Mautone, P., & Mayer, R. (2001). Signal as a cognitive guide to multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 377-389.
Mayer, D. A. (1995). How can we best use children’s literature in teaching science concepts? Science and Children, 32(6), 16-19, 43.
Mayer, R., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S., (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 187-198.
Mayer, V. J. (1995). Using the earth system for integrating the science curriculum. Science Education, 79(4), 375-391.
McDiarmid, G. W., & Wilson, S. (1991). An exploration of subject-matter knowledge of alternative route teachers: Can we assume they know their subject? Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 32-35.
McDonald, J., & Czerniak, K. (1994). Developing interdisciplinary units: Strategies and examples. School Science and Mathematics, 94(1), 5-10.
McEwin, C. K., Dickenson, T. S., & Hamilton, H. (2000). National board certified teachers’ views regarding specialized middle level teacher preparation. The Clearing House, 73(4), 211-213.
McLauren, P. (1998, fall). Revolutionary pedagogy in post-revolutionary times. Educational Theory, 48(4), 431-462.
McLaughlin, D. W. (1997). School to school partnership. Science and Children, 34(5), 26-29. Meng, E., & Doren, R. L. (1990). What research says…about appropriate methods of assessment. Science and Children, 56(1), 42-45.
Mertens, S. B., Flowers, N., & Mulhall, P. F. (2003). Should middle grades students be left alone after school? Middle School Journal, 5, 57-61.
Meyer, C. A. (1993). What’s the difference between authentic and performance assessment? Educational Leadership, 51, 39-40.
Miller, K. W., Steiner, S. F., & Larson, C. D. (1996). Strategies for science learning. Science and Children, 33(6), 24-27, 61.
Moll, M. (2003). Computers and kids: pulling the plug can protect the planet. Phi Delta Kappan, April, 600.
Monk, D. H. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13(2), 125-145.
Morrison, D., & Collins, J. (1995). Epistemic fluency and constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology, 35(4), 60-63.
Morrison, G. M., & Skiba, R. (2001). Predicting violence from school misbehavior: promises and perils. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 173-182.
Morrison, G. R. Ross, S, M., & Baldwin, W. (1992). Learner control of context and instructional support in elementary school mathematics. Educational Technology, Research, & Development, 40, 5-13.
Musheno, B. V., & Lawson, A. E. (1999). Effects of learning cycle and traditional text on comprehension of science concepts by students at differing reasoning levels. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 23-37.
Munro, J. (1999). Learning more about learning improves teacher effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10, 151-171.
Murphy, J., Evertson, C. & Radnofsky, M.(1991). Restructuring schools: Fourteen elementary and secondary teachers’ perspectives on reform. The Elementary School Journal, 92(2), 135-148.
Nakhleh, M. B., & Samarapungavan, A. (1999). Elementary school children’s beliefs about matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 777-805.
National Forum to Accelerate Middle Grades Reform. (2002). Our vision statement. Retrieved November 15, 2002, from http://www.mgforum.org/vision.asp
National Middle School Association (2002). National Middle school Association/ National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education- Approved middle-level teacher preparation standards. Available on-line at http://www.nmsa.org
Negroni, P. (2003). A network of relationships. Phi Delta Kappan, December, 284. Nicaise, M., & Barnes, D. (1996). The union of technology, constructivism, and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 47(3), 205-212.
Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 10: 923-949.
Padilla, M. J., & Pyle, E. J. (1996). Observing and inferring promotes science learning. Science and Children, 33(8), 22-25.
Paez, M. (2003). Gimme that school where everything’s scripted! – One Teacher’s journey toward effective literacy instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, June, 757.
Paris, S., & Paris, A. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36, 89-101.
Patrick, B., Hisley, J., & Kempler, T. (2000). “What’s everybody so excited about?”: The effects of teacher enthusiasm on student intrinsic motivation and vitality. Journal of Experimental Education, 68, 217-236.
Pena, R. (1997). Cultural differences and the construction of meaning. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 5 (10) Online. Available: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v5n10.html
Phelps, A. J. & Lee, C. (2003). The power of practice: what students learn from how we teach. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(7), 829-832.
Phillips, W. C. (1991). Earth and space science misconceptions. The Science Teacher, 58, 21-23.
Pierce, M. (2000, September/October). Portrait of the “super principal.” Harvard Education Letter, 16, 6-7.
Potari, D., & Spiliotopoulou, V. (1996). Children’s approaches to the concept of volume. Science Education, 80(3), 341-360.
Putnam, R. and H. Borko (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher 29: 4-15.
Reeves, D. B. (2001b, June 6). If you hate standards, learn to love the bell curve. Education Week, 48.
Rex, L. A. (2001). The remaking of a high school reader. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(3), 288-314.
Romance, N. R., and M. R. Vitale, 2001. Implementing an in-depth expanded science model in elementary schools: Multi-year findings, research issues, and policy implications. International Journal of Science Education 23: 373-404.
Routman, R. (2002, March). Teacher talk. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 32-35.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., and R. J. Shavelson (1996). Rhetoric and reality in science performance assessments: An update. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33: 1045-1063.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., R. J. Shavelson, L. Hamilton, and S. Klein (2002). On the evaluation of systemic science education reform: Searching for instructional sensitivity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (5): 369-393.
Rumberger, R. W. (1995). Dropping out of middle school: A multilevel analysis of students and schools. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 583-625.
Russo, A. (2002, November/December). Beefing up professional development. Harvard Educational Letter, 18, 1-3.
Rye, J. A., & Rubba, P. A. (1998). An exploration of the concept map as an interview tool to facilitate the externalization of students’ understanding about global atmospheric change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(5), 521-546.
Sandoval, W. A. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students’ scientific explanations. Journal of Learning Sciences 12 (1): 5-51.
Saunders, W. L. (1992). The constructivist perspective: Implications for teaching strategies for science. School Science and Mathematics, 92 (3), 138.
Scales, P. C. & McEwin, C. K. (1996). The effects of comprehensive middle-level teacher preparation programs. Research in Middle-Level Education Quarterly, 19 (2), 1-21.
Schlechty, P. (1993). On thr frontiers of school reform with trailblazers, pioneers, and settlers. Journal of Staff Development,14(4), 46-51.
Schraw, G., Wade, S. E., & Kardash, C. A. (1993). Interactive effects of text-based and task-based importance on learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 652-661.
Schwartz, W. (2001). School practices for equitable discipline of African American students. New York: ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 455 343).
Searson, R. & Dunn, R. (2001). The learning style teaching model. Science and Children, 38(5), 22-26.
Shapiro, B. L. (1996). A case study of change in elementary student teaching thinking during an independent investigation in science: Learning about the “face of science that does not yet know.” Science Education, 80(5), 535-560.
Shaw, E. L., & Hatfield, M. M. (1996). A survey of the use of science manipulatives in elementary schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 404160.)
Sheets, R. (2002). You’re just a kid that’s here: Chicago perception of disciplinary events. Journal of Latinos and Education, 1(2), 105-122.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29 (7), 4-14.
Sherman, G. P., & Klein, J. D. (1995). The effects of cued interaction and ability grouping during cooperative computer-based science instruction. Educational Technology, Research, and Development, 43, 5-24.
Siegel, M. A. and M. A. Ramney (2003). Developing the Changes in Attitude about the Relevance of Science (CARS) questionnaire and assessing two high school science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 (8): 757-775.
Simpson, J. O. (2003, January). Beating the odds. American School Board Journal, 190(1), 43-47.
Singer, J. R. W. Marx, J. Krajcik, and J. C. Chambers. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist 35: 165-178.
Solomon, D., Battistich, D., Watson, M., Schaps, E., & Lewis, C. (2000). A six-district study of educational change: Direct and mediated effects of the child development project. Social Psychology of Education, 4, 3-51.
Sneider, C. I., & Ohadi, M. M. (1998). Unraveling students’ misconceptions about the Earth’s shape and gravity. Science Education, 82, 265-284.
Sparks, D. (1999, November). Using lesson study to improve teaching. National Staff Development Council. Available at: www.rbs.org/lesson_study/readings_and_resources.shtml Speaker, K. M., & Petersen, G. J. (2000). School violence and adolescent suicide: Strategies for effective intervention. Educational Review, 52(1), 65-73.
Stahly, L. L., Krockover, G. H., & Shepardson, D. P. (1999). Third grade students’ ideas about the lunar phases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 159-177
Stavy, R. (1991a). Children’s conceptions of changes in the state of matter: From liquid (or solid) to gas. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 247-266.
Stavy, R. (1991b). Children’s ideas about matter. School Science and Mathematics, 91, 240-244.
Steffes, B., & Valentine, J. (1996). The relationship between organizational characteristics and expected benefits in interdisciplinary teams. Research in Middle Level Education Quarterly, 19(4), 83-106.
Stevens, B. A. (2003). Creating comfortable and productive parent/teacher conferences. Phi Delta Kappan, March, 521.
Suares, M., Pias, R., Membiela, P., & Dapia, D. (1998). Classroom environment in the implementation of an innovative curriculum project in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 655-671.
Taylor, C. T. (1994). Assessment for measurement of standards: The peril and promise of large-scale reform. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 231-262.
Teel, K. M., Debruin-Parecki, A., & Covington, M. V. (1998). Teaching strategies that honor and motivate inner-city African-American students: A school/university collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 479-495.
Tessmer, M., & Richey, R. C. (1997). The role of context in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology, Research, and Development, 45, 85-111.
TIMMS Video Mathematics Research Group. (2003). Understanding and improving mathematics teaching: highlights from the TIMMS 1999 video study. Phi Delta Kappan, June, 768.
Tobin, K. (1988). Alternative perspectives of effective science teaching. Science Education, 72(4), 433-451.
Tuovinen, J. E., & Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology 91 (2): 334-341.
Townsend, B. L. (2000). The disproportionate discipline of African-American learners: Reducing school suspensions and expulsions. Exceptional Children, 66(3), 381-391.
Treagust, D. R., Jacobowitz, J. Gallagher, and J. Parker. (2001). Using assessment as a guide in teaching for understanding: A case study of a middle school science class learning about sound. Science Education 85: 137-157.
Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68 (2), 202 – 248.
Van Gerven, P.W. M., Paas, F. G. W. C., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Schmidt, H. G. (2002). Cognitive load theory and aging: Effects of worked examples on training efficiency. Learning and Instruction, 12, 87-105.
Volkmann, M. J. & Abell, S. K. (2003). Seamless assessment: using the 5E learning model, the authors describe their strategies for embedding assessment throughout a unit teaching pre-service teachers about the phases of the moon. Science and Children, 40(8), 41-45.
Watanabe, T. (2002). Learning from Japanese lesson study. Educational Leadership, 59:6, 36-39.
Warren, L. L., & Muth, K. D. (1995). The impact of common planning time on middle grade students and teachers. Research in Middle Level Education, 18(3), 41-58.
White, B. Y., and J. R. Frederickson (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction 16 (1): 3-117.
Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 301-311.
Willert, J., & Willert, R. (2000). An ignored antidote to school violence: Classrooms that reinforce positive social habits. American Secondary Education, 29 (1), 27-33.
Wilson, S. M., & et al. (2002). Teacher preparation research: An insider’s view from the outside. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 190-204.
Wilson, M. and K. Sloane (2000). From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education 13 (2): 181-208.
Wise, A. E. (2003, April 9). What’s wrong with teacher certification? Education Week, 22(30), 56, 42-43.
Wolf, D. (1989). Portfolio assessment: Sampling student work. Educational Leadership, 46(7), 35-39.
Woloshyn, V. E., Paivio, A., & pressley, M. (1994). Use of elaborative interrogation to help students acquire information consistent with prior knowledge and information inconsistent with prior knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 79-80.
Wong, H. (2002, March). Induction: The best form of professional development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 52-54.
Zenger, S. K. (2002). Why teach certain material at specific grade levels? Phi Delta Kappan, November, 212.
Zhao, Y., Pugh. K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515.